http://indianeconomy.org/2005/10/27/blogs-development-thinking/ Issues & insights Sun, 7 Sep 2008 18:01:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://indianeconomy.org/2005/10/27/blogs-development-thinking/#comment-556 ak Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:46:51 +0000 http://indianeconomy.org/2005/10/27/blogs-development-thinking/#comment-556 People all over the world used to talk even before they started blogging.And people all over the world are still talking.But quality of the debate has improved because we can here them.Right?let us take the example of live8 concert.As far as i know purpose of the organizers of the concert was to mobilise the support of the people all over the world,and the people living in G8 countries in particular, and to force the G8 countries to cancell the debt of African countries.It is a fact that G8 countries indirectly control the economy of the African countries by controlling their wealth of the natural resources.It is also a fact that prosperity of the G8 countries can be partly attributed to their control of Africa's natural resources.Everbody has the right to form and express his/her opinion about the concert.But how does it improves the quality of the debate? People all over the world used to talk even before they started blogging.And people all over the world are still talking.But quality of the debate has improved because we can here them.Right?let us take the example of live8 concert.As far as i know purpose of the organizers of the concert was to mobilise the support of the people all over the world,and the people living in G8 countries in particular, and to force the G8 countries to cancell the debt of African countries.It is a fact that G8 countries indirectly control the economy of the African countries by controlling their wealth of the natural resources.It is also a fact that prosperity of the G8 countries can be partly attributed to their control of Africa’s natural resources.Everbody has the right to form and express his/her opinion about the concert.But how does it improves the quality of the debate?

]]>