<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: India Ain&#8217;t That Far Behind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/07/india-aint-that-far-behind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/07/india-aint-that-far-behind/</link>
	<description>Issues &#38; insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:01:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: goldwinner</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/07/india-aint-that-far-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-267704</link>
		<dc:creator>goldwinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=168#comment-267704</guid>
		<description>This super-power is nothing more than a ploy to open up the economy for abuse by &#039;global powers&#039;. India does not have penis envy with other super power wananbes. The ruling elites have thus far resisted the temptation to pull down the pants at the cost of the rural populace. Lets just keep it that way. Let somebody else inflate their currency and disenfranchise their population.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This super-power is nothing more than a ploy to open up the economy for abuse by &#8216;global powers&#8217;. India does not have penis envy with other super power wananbes. The ruling elites have thus far resisted the temptation to pull down the pants at the cost of the rural populace. Lets just keep it that way. Let somebody else inflate their currency and disenfranchise their population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KingR3a</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/07/india-aint-that-far-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-267694</link>
		<dc:creator>KingR3a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=168#comment-267694</guid>
		<description>How can India become a superpower if it isn&#039;t even recognized as a regional power yet? They may eventually have a better economic ground than China eventually, but never do I think any time soon it will become a super power. Since India barely influences the world in any way so far  - a new economic force EVENTUALLY? Yes.
- Super power? I doubt that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can India become a superpower if it isn&#8217;t even recognized as a regional power yet? They may eventually have a better economic ground than China eventually, but never do I think any time soon it will become a super power. Since India barely influences the world in any way so far  &#8211; a new economic force EVENTUALLY? Yes.<br />
- Super power? I doubt that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanket</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/07/india-aint-that-far-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-262774</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=168#comment-262774</guid>
		<description>There is nothing wrong in forcing a one child norm because it prevents millions to be born into a miserable and hopeless existence.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Who determines what is hopeless or miserable? I may believe that human existence itself is hopeless and miserable. Hence, having children would be regarded as a crime. 

A state that changes my core identity from the child of my parents to the slave of society is inherently evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing wrong in forcing a one child norm because it prevents millions to be born into a miserable and hopeless existence.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Who determines what is hopeless or miserable? I may believe that human existence itself is hopeless and miserable. Hence, having children would be regarded as a crime. </p>
<p>A state that changes my core identity from the child of my parents to the slave of society is inherently evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shekhar suman</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/07/india-aint-that-far-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-45663</link>
		<dc:creator>shekhar suman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 21:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=168#comment-45663</guid>
		<description>definettly these days china is ahead of INDIA in many aspect but if any one want to know the real  capacity, the real streangth of INDIA go back in history when there were no colonialism when all nations got equal chance to grow up to 17th century indian population was one third of world poplation  and chinese population was one fourth ane their respective contribution in world GDP was also one third and one fourth then how can anyone say that chinese are better then indians let the indians get the chance ,let the ondoans avail the chance what chinese have achieved till now is only because of political scenario in the time of cold war and when cold war finished i mean after cold war  whatever india started india is faar faar ahead of china in that field take any example from nuclear power to in fornation technology</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>definettly these days china is ahead of INDIA in many aspect but if any one want to know the real  capacity, the real streangth of INDIA go back in history when there were no colonialism when all nations got equal chance to grow up to 17th century indian population was one third of world poplation  and chinese population was one fourth ane their respective contribution in world GDP was also one third and one fourth then how can anyone say that chinese are better then indians let the indians get the chance ,let the ondoans avail the chance what chinese have achieved till now is only because of political scenario in the time of cold war and when cold war finished i mean after cold war  whatever india started india is faar faar ahead of china in that field take any example from nuclear power to in fornation technology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HawkEye &#187; links for 2005-12-16</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/07/india-aint-that-far-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-1291</link>
		<dc:creator>HawkEye &#187; links for 2005-12-16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=168#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>[...] build infrastructure? (tags: India China Economics Economy Language English Investments)   The Indian Economy Blog » Blog Archive » India Ain’t That Far Behind China ha [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] build infrastructure? (tags: India China Economics Economy Language English Investments)   The Indian Economy Blog » Blog Archive » India Ain’t That Far Behind China ha [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Indian Economy Blog  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Running Out Of Knowledge Workers</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/07/india-aint-that-far-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>The Indian Economy Blog  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Running Out Of Knowledge Workers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=168#comment-1216</guid>
		<description>[...] s salaries,” says McKinsey &amp; Co partner Noshir Kaka. 	Quite. As I&#8217;d mentioned here, our strengths are much more suited to labour-intensive manufacture than ser [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] s salaries,” says McKinsey &#38; Co partner Noshir Kaka. 	Quite. As I&#8217;d mentioned here, our strengths are much more suited to labour-intensive manufacture than ser [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badri Hiriyur</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/07/india-aint-that-far-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-1186</link>
		<dc:creator>Badri Hiriyur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=168#comment-1186</guid>
		<description>Article from McKinsey Quarterly (free access till Dec 16, 2005):
When to make India a manufacturing base
http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/links/20030

Excerpts:
&quot;India leads the market in offshored back-office services, but as a manufacturing center it lags behind China, Thailand, and the rest of Asia (Exhibit 1). The reasons are well documented: multinational companies operating in India must overcome erratic electricity supplies, poor roads, and gridlocked seaports and airports while contending with government policies that discourage hiring and hold back domestic demand for goods in many sectors.&quot;

&quot;Automakers in developed markets must contend with twin pressures: to innovate and, at the same time, to reduce costs. On the one hand, they must not only develop expensive new features to please consumers but also ratchet up their environmental and safety standards; on the other, the base price of a car is expected to remain flat over the next decade. This combination of factors is pushing companies to source more components from places where costs are lower. McKinsey analysis suggests that, as a result, outsourcing in this sector could be worth $375 billion by 2015, up from $65 billion in 2002.

We think that India could capture up to $25 billion of this amount, to become (along with China, Mexico, and Thailand) one of the developing world&#039;s top sourcing bases. Already, out of a sample of more than 400 Indian suppliers, 80 percent have ISO 9000 certification—the international standard for quality management.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article from McKinsey Quarterly (free access till Dec 16, 2005):<br />
When to make India a manufacturing base<br />
<a href="http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/links/20030" rel="nofollow">http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/links/20030</a></p>
<p>Excerpts:<br />
&#8220;India leads the market in offshored back-office services, but as a manufacturing center it lags behind China, Thailand, and the rest of Asia (Exhibit 1). The reasons are well documented: multinational companies operating in India must overcome erratic electricity supplies, poor roads, and gridlocked seaports and airports while contending with government policies that discourage hiring and hold back domestic demand for goods in many sectors.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Automakers in developed markets must contend with twin pressures: to innovate and, at the same time, to reduce costs. On the one hand, they must not only develop expensive new features to please consumers but also ratchet up their environmental and safety standards; on the other, the base price of a car is expected to remain flat over the next decade. This combination of factors is pushing companies to source more components from places where costs are lower. McKinsey analysis suggests that, as a result, outsourcing in this sector could be worth $375 billion by 2015, up from $65 billion in 2002.</p>
<p>We think that India could capture up to $25 billion of this amount, to become (along with China, Mexico, and Thailand) one of the developing world&#8217;s top sourcing bases. Already, out of a sample of more than 400 Indian suppliers, 80 percent have ISO 9000 certification—the international standard for quality management.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sv</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/07/india-aint-that-far-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator>sv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=168#comment-1180</guid>
		<description>&quot;couple of children can bring joy to life too&quot;

May be for the parents.  But how about the children and their joys? I read a news item during the Mumbai floods about a poor construction worker stranded with FOUR small kids.  What&#039;s she thinking?  Why is she having four kids? If it&#039;s China, there will be THREE less kids living a miserable life.  

There was another news about a woman in Orissa selling one of her kid because she can&#039;t afford to raise him.  If she had stopped with just one kid, there was no need for her to sell kids.  

There is nothing wrong in forcing a one child norm because it prevents millions to be born into a miserable and hopeless existence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;couple of children can bring joy to life too&#8221;</p>
<p>May be for the parents.  But how about the children and their joys? I read a news item during the Mumbai floods about a poor construction worker stranded with FOUR small kids.  What&#8217;s she thinking?  Why is she having four kids? If it&#8217;s China, there will be THREE less kids living a miserable life.  </p>
<p>There was another news about a woman in Orissa selling one of her kid because she can&#8217;t afford to raise him.  If she had stopped with just one kid, there was no need for her to sell kids.  </p>
<p>There is nothing wrong in forcing a one child norm because it prevents millions to be born into a miserable and hopeless existence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alok Patel</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/07/india-aint-that-far-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-1173</link>
		<dc:creator>Alok Patel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 08:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=168#comment-1173</guid>
		<description>China benefits from its undemocratic style of functioning. It has repeatedly shown us that it can change itself dramatically whenever it wants to. And in China, the forces of change are far better controlled by the government than they are in India.

So when China decides that some aspects of the way things are done are really putting them at a disadvantage. they might clamp down hard. Hell, which other country on the planet is building a new thermal power plant every 5th day? In comparision, India has been dithering about one 2500 MW plant for the last 9 years. 

Thanks to this delay, Urban Maharashtra today faces 3 hours of daily loadshedding while rural Maharashtra faces upto 12. And this is a state that boasts of being the most industralised in the country. Calculate the costs to the economy here. And while there has been talk of so many more plants, MoUs were signed (most in 2005) only when the gaping disparity between supply and demand has achieved damaging proportions threatening to stunt economic growth of the state.

The point is, despite its gargantuan proportions, China tends to be fleetfooted. And at the same time, India is much more like the elephant that western stereotypes associate it with. Though I&#039;d stick with democracy anyday, we seriously need to tighten up the bureaucracy and loosen up the license raj further if we want to gain a distinct advantage over China.

Despite all the benefits that the Chinese system gives them, I&#039;d really worry when they become a democracy. And the change might not be far away either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China benefits from its undemocratic style of functioning. It has repeatedly shown us that it can change itself dramatically whenever it wants to. And in China, the forces of change are far better controlled by the government than they are in India.</p>
<p>So when China decides that some aspects of the way things are done are really putting them at a disadvantage. they might clamp down hard. Hell, which other country on the planet is building a new thermal power plant every 5th day? In comparision, India has been dithering about one 2500 MW plant for the last 9 years. </p>
<p>Thanks to this delay, Urban Maharashtra today faces 3 hours of daily loadshedding while rural Maharashtra faces upto 12. And this is a state that boasts of being the most industralised in the country. Calculate the costs to the economy here. And while there has been talk of so many more plants, MoUs were signed (most in 2005) only when the gaping disparity between supply and demand has achieved damaging proportions threatening to stunt economic growth of the state.</p>
<p>The point is, despite its gargantuan proportions, China tends to be fleetfooted. And at the same time, India is much more like the elephant that western stereotypes associate it with. Though I&#8217;d stick with democracy anyday, we seriously need to tighten up the bureaucracy and loosen up the license raj further if we want to gain a distinct advantage over China.</p>
<p>Despite all the benefits that the Chinese system gives them, I&#8217;d really worry when they become a democracy. And the change might not be far away either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chandra Dulam</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/07/india-aint-that-far-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>Chandra Dulam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 18:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=168#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>Regarding sv&#039;s comment #5

China has an excellent population control policy– the most humanitarian act by the chinese government. Imagine if China did not have the one child norm: ....It’s really unfortunatethat India cannot force a one child norm. 
 
A recent WSJ had a front page article on how humanitarian the forced abortion of fetus can be.  Per capita is not the only thing in life...couple of children can bring joy to life too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding sv&#8217;s comment #5</p>
<p>China has an excellent population control policy– the most humanitarian act by the chinese government. Imagine if China did not have the one child norm: &#8230;.It’s really unfortunatethat India cannot force a one child norm. </p>
<p>A recent WSJ had a front page article on how humanitarian the forced abortion of fetus can be.  Per capita is not the only thing in life&#8230;couple of children can bring joy to life too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
