<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Consequence Of The Rent-Control Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/08/one-consequence-of-the-rent-control-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/08/one-consequence-of-the-rent-control-act/</link>
	<description>Issues &#38; insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:33:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankan Kd</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/08/one-consequence-of-the-rent-control-act/comment-page-1/#comment-271518</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankan Kd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 12:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=169#comment-271518</guid>
		<description>you have done very good job..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you have done very good job..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daryl</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/08/one-consequence-of-the-rent-control-act/comment-page-1/#comment-270380</link>
		<dc:creator>daryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=169#comment-270380</guid>
		<description>The Maharashtra Rent act continues to protect tenants living in sprawling 1000 sq ft apartments paying Rs.100 per month as rent.There are many rich industrialists lawyers and other prominent citizens of mumbai living as tenants residing in these apartments.These tenants have a net value of more than Rupees one crore.But the government continues to say that they are protecting the poor and helpless.Who is the government trying to protect.The rent act is purely a vote bank device and requires to be scrapped</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Maharashtra Rent act continues to protect tenants living in sprawling 1000 sq ft apartments paying Rs.100 per month as rent.There are many rich industrialists lawyers and other prominent citizens of mumbai living as tenants residing in these apartments.These tenants have a net value of more than Rupees one crore.But the government continues to say that they are protecting the poor and helpless.Who is the government trying to protect.The rent act is purely a vote bank device and requires to be scrapped</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravikiran Rao</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/08/one-consequence-of-the-rent-control-act/comment-page-1/#comment-1165</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravikiran Rao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 05:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=169#comment-1165</guid>
		<description>Chandra, 
Very badly. New York has the same problems that Mumbai has. I don&#039;t know about SFO, but from what I know of rent control in the US, the cities that have them have housing shortages and crumbling infrastructure. The correlation is quite strong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chandra,<br />
Very badly. New York has the same problems that Mumbai has. I don&#8217;t know about SFO, but from what I know of rent control in the US, the cities that have them have housing shortages and crumbling infrastructure. The correlation is quite strong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chandra Dulam</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/08/one-consequence-of-the-rent-control-act/comment-page-1/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>Chandra Dulam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 18:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=169#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>While I don&#039;t favor rent control (it surely doesn&#039;t make slums less likely), I think San Francisco and New York have some kind of rent control. Surely Mumbai buildings are more dilapidated then buildings in those two cities.  I wonder how the controls work in these cities?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I don&#8217;t favor rent control (it surely doesn&#8217;t make slums less likely), I think San Francisco and New York have some kind of rent control. Surely Mumbai buildings are more dilapidated then buildings in those two cities.  I wonder how the controls work in these cities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Varma</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/08/one-consequence-of-the-rent-control-act/comment-page-1/#comment-1152</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Varma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 09:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=169#comment-1152</guid>
		<description>Thanks Manoj, my mistake. Changing now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Manoj, my mistake. Changing now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manoj</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/08/one-consequence-of-the-rent-control-act/comment-page-1/#comment-1149</link>
		<dc:creator>Manoj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 09:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=169#comment-1149</guid>
		<description>The amount should be $540 mn not $5.4 bn as mentoned</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The amount should be $540 mn not $5.4 bn as mentoned</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

