<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lee Kuan Yew on India - Part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/22/lee-kuan-yew-on-india-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/22/lee-kuan-yew-on-india-part-3/</link>
	<description>Issues &#38; insights</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mattg</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/22/lee-kuan-yew-on-india-part-3/#comment-63899</link>
		<dc:creator>mattg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 04:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=196#comment-63899</guid>
		<description>not sure how I ended up on this site, but glad I did!
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure how I ended up on this site, but glad I did!<br />
:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Indian Economy Blog  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Why Does India Have Such Terrible Politicians?- - 2</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/22/lee-kuan-yew-on-india-part-3/#comment-2093</link>
		<dc:creator>The Indian Economy Blog  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Why Does India Have Such Terrible Politicians?- - 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=196#comment-2093</guid>
		<description>[...] s problems.   Atanu&#8217;s sentiments in his series of posts on Lee Kuan Yew, that &#8220;when it comes to greed Indian politicians are a class apart&#8221; is an oft-re [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] s problems.   Atanu&#8217;s sentiments in his series of posts on Lee Kuan Yew, that &#8220;when it comes to greed Indian politicians are a class apart&#8221; is an oft-re [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhishek Rai</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/22/lee-kuan-yew-on-india-part-3/#comment-1457</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhishek Rai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=196#comment-1457</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I have read thw whole of LKY series, and I am still ondering!!!!
It is so hard to swallow that there still exist people, who are justifying what Nehruji,Gandhiji, Soniajidid and..... and coming ji would do, and mire our fellow countrymen in abject poverty.
If someone says that India is democracy, which is solving its own problem, I must point out that it is more of the famed demon"Bhasmasur", who inspite of being potentially great burnt himself down to ashes.And let us all keep in mind that democracy is practised by the top 20 to 30 percent, and not the bottom 70-80 percent, who get to practise it once in a centrally planned term.
And as Krish Bhai said, blogging freely is not and should not be a measure for the success for any country.It has to be food, shelter and clothes+education, which we have failed to provide to the majority.The rest who have got it ,do not enjoy the quality.Look around you Mr.Nehruvians.What we have is the skeletol remains of his grandioseness, which is hurting us all the time.
PLease!Please!Please! let us all be pragmatic enough and KILL THE BEAUROCRACY .
Dey dada! count me in your army.I am available for the recruitment in your SENA, to kill the stupid heads.Do send me a list  to eliminate them ASAP.
Keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I have read thw whole of LKY series, and I am still ondering!!!!<br />
It is so hard to swallow that there still exist people, who are justifying what Nehruji,Gandhiji, Soniajidid and&#8230;.. and coming ji would do, and mire our fellow countrymen in abject poverty.<br />
If someone says that India is democracy, which is solving its own problem, I must point out that it is more of the famed demon&#8221;Bhasmasur&#8221;, who inspite of being potentially great burnt himself down to ashes.And let us all keep in mind that democracy is practised by the top 20 to 30 percent, and not the bottom 70-80 percent, who get to practise it once in a centrally planned term.<br />
And as Krish Bhai said, blogging freely is not and should not be a measure for the success for any country.It has to be food, shelter and clothes+education, which we have failed to provide to the majority.The rest who have got it ,do not enjoy the quality.Look around you Mr.Nehruvians.What we have is the skeletol remains of his grandioseness, which is hurting us all the time.<br />
PLease!Please!Please! let us all be pragmatic enough and KILL THE BEAUROCRACY .<br />
Dey dada! count me in your army.I am available for the recruitment in your SENA, to kill the stupid heads.Do send me a list  to eliminate them ASAP.<br />
Keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pinto</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/22/lee-kuan-yew-on-india-part-3/#comment-1447</link>
		<dc:creator>pinto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 03:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=196#comment-1447</guid>
		<description>LKY seems to be sending a not so sutle message to Manmohan etc. PERFORM [REFORM] OR STEP ASIDE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LKY seems to be sending a not so sutle message to Manmohan etc. PERFORM [REFORM] OR STEP ASIDE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patel</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/22/lee-kuan-yew-on-india-part-3/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator>Patel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=196#comment-1443</guid>
		<description>I wonder what good LKY's speech did. India's current situation is not due to the ineptitude of its politicians. Their hearts, not their brains are the problem. They create policies only to further their own individual and/or party goals. Read this article and tell me it doesn't make you want to throw up:

http://www.asiamedia.ucla.edu/article.asp?parentid=36053</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what good LKY&#8217;s speech did. India&#8217;s current situation is not due to the ineptitude of its politicians. Their hearts, not their brains are the problem. They create policies only to further their own individual and/or party goals. Read this article and tell me it doesn&#8217;t make you want to throw up:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.asiamedia.ucla.edu/article.asp?parentid=36053" rel="nofollow">http://www.asiamedia.ucla.edu/article.asp?parentid=36053</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amrit</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/22/lee-kuan-yew-on-india-part-3/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator>Amrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=196#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>The idea of totally open FDI is a bit shady to say the least. Foreign companies generate employment, agreed, but in the short run. There is no permanency, and they are like the rats in a ship -- they are the first ones to leave the ship when the ship is about to sink.

Although I'm all for the government getting out of the way, there has to be some methodology (regulation? ah!) to see that the international companies don't use the country like a leech, as they are prone to do. Regional development is for self interest for the local, indigenous companies and not for the multinationals because they are here just for profits (and I don't blame them for that). Take the example of the Coca Cola company. They have completely messed up with the local water table where they have their bottling plant (somewhere in the south?).

Companies that otherwise are the epitomes of propriety in their own countries (because of the strict laws) go berserk in other countries and miserably exploit the local populations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of totally open FDI is a bit shady to say the least. Foreign companies generate employment, agreed, but in the short run. There is no permanency, and they are like the rats in a ship &#8212; they are the first ones to leave the ship when the ship is about to sink.</p>
<p>Although I&#8217;m all for the government getting out of the way, there has to be some methodology (regulation? ah!) to see that the international companies don&#8217;t use the country like a leech, as they are prone to do. Regional development is for self interest for the local, indigenous companies and not for the multinationals because they are here just for profits (and I don&#8217;t blame them for that). Take the example of the Coca Cola company. They have completely messed up with the local water table where they have their bottling plant (somewhere in the south?).</p>
<p>Companies that otherwise are the epitomes of propriety in their own countries (because of the strict laws) go berserk in other countries and miserably exploit the local populations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuffir</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/22/lee-kuan-yew-on-india-part-3/#comment-1440</link>
		<dc:creator>kuffir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=196#comment-1440</guid>
		<description>'The people are assumed sophisticated enough to figure out who should rule the nation, but they are not smart enough to make simple day to day market decisions; for the latter, they have to have a patronizing government official in charge'

couldn't agree with you more on this dichotomy. and about manmohan singh : who asked him to assume pmship if he wasn't prepared to  manage the politicians ? this obscene idea that a combination of a  bureaucrat-pm who needn't bother about political issues and a non-executive political leader who would, is as good as a single political leader-pm shows how weak and weak-thinking the congress has become. seen from a larger perspective, one could say that our idea of democracy has become rather skewed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The people are assumed sophisticated enough to figure out who should rule the nation, but they are not smart enough to make simple day to day market decisions; for the latter, they have to have a patronizing government official in charge&#8217;</p>
<p>couldn&#8217;t agree with you more on this dichotomy. and about manmohan singh : who asked him to assume pmship if he wasn&#8217;t prepared to  manage the politicians ? this obscene idea that a combination of a  bureaucrat-pm who needn&#8217;t bother about political issues and a non-executive political leader who would, is as good as a single political leader-pm shows how weak and weak-thinking the congress has become. seen from a larger perspective, one could say that our idea of democracy has become rather skewed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bleeding Heart</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2005/12/22/lee-kuan-yew-on-india-part-3/#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>Bleeding Heart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=196#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>Why did you guys remove Dilip D'souza from your blogroll?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did you guys remove Dilip D&#8217;souza from your blogroll?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
