<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public Good? Very Bad! Very Bad!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://indianeconomy.org/2006/01/23/public-good-very-bad-very-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2006/01/23/public-good-very-bad-very-bad/</link>
	<description>Issues &#38; insights</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bharath</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2006/01/23/public-good-very-bad-very-bad/#comment-1814</link>
		<dc:creator>bharath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=233#comment-1814</guid>
		<description>You are making creating a difficulty with the example of A,A,A ... because as a society there is a pact between us the people and our government. In A,A,A you tend to propose they are individual who have only their interest to keep. and the "pact" is the basic fabric of democracy. yes, if you ignore this then almost any public enterprise will look bad. but sometimes answer to bad public enterprise is good democracy not private enterprise. just have to look at Norway. But will we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are making creating a difficulty with the example of A,A,A &#8230; because as a society there is a pact between us the people and our government. In A,A,A you tend to propose they are individual who have only their interest to keep. and the &#8220;pact&#8221; is the basic fabric of democracy. yes, if you ignore this then almost any public enterprise will look bad. but sometimes answer to bad public enterprise is good democracy not private enterprise. just have to look at Norway. But will we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reuben Abraham</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2006/01/23/public-good-very-bad-very-bad/#comment-1810</link>
		<dc:creator>Reuben Abraham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=233#comment-1810</guid>
		<description>Very, very interesting, Guru. Do me/us a favour. The next time you see something like this, will you please snap a photo for us? I think it would be the perfect thing to put up on this blog and elsewhere. I'll also watch out for something like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very, very interesting, Guru. Do me/us a favour. The next time you see something like this, will you please snap a photo for us? I think it would be the perfect thing to put up on this blog and elsewhere. I&#8217;ll also watch out for something like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guru Gulab Khatri</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2006/01/23/public-good-very-bad-very-bad/#comment-1793</link>
		<dc:creator>Guru Gulab Khatri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=233#comment-1793</guid>
		<description>Speaking of atlas,
I saw a couple of toyish globes at wallmart.
All of kashmir, including jammu and laddakh was shown as a disputed territory.
Arunachal pradesh was shown in china.
Taiwan was not shown as independent country.
Guess where the globe was made....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of atlas,<br />
I saw a couple of toyish globes at wallmart.<br />
All of kashmir, including jammu and laddakh was shown as a disputed territory.<br />
Arunachal pradesh was shown in china.<br />
Taiwan was not shown as independent country.<br />
Guess where the globe was made&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
