<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indian IT Industry</title>
	<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/</link>
	<description>Issues &#38; insights</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mohan</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-156072</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 02:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-156072</guid>
		<description>Just one nitpick: One crucial factor that enabled IT industry to grow out of staff augmentation to project delivery model was the nature of its work - it was possible to develop code here and deliver it over the wire. That is not really possible with construction industry, is it? So to compare IT industry with Gulf and suggest that they were somehow smart enough to make the transition is not really fair. If it were possible to build buildings here and deliver it over the wire to Gulf, even those enterpreneurs would have evolved into project delivery model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just one nitpick: One crucial factor that enabled IT industry to grow out of staff augmentation to project delivery model was the nature of its work - it was possible to develop code here and deliver it over the wire. That is not really possible with construction industry, is it? So to compare IT industry with Gulf and suggest that they were somehow smart enough to make the transition is not really fair. If it were possible to build buildings here and deliver it over the wire to Gulf, even those enterpreneurs would have evolved into project delivery model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shefaly</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-154623</link>
		<dc:creator>Shefaly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-154623</guid>
		<description>The industry employs just 1Million people and contributes to less than 5% of nominal and less than 1% of PPP adjusted GDP. To expect it to work wonders of social re-engineering or deliver some miracles of process or product innovation is similar to expecting Angelina Jolie to solve the unwanted orphans problem in the world, just because of a high profile. 

What the industry can do, like Jolie, is raise awareness of some important issues on the socio-political agenda, may be even help raise funding but on its own, it can only employ people who are really capable (just like Jolie adopts only the kids she 'falls in love with'), and it can only grow at a rate of growth which can be sustained (just like Jolie can only outsource so many kids to Pitt while she is saving the world). 

When it comes to expectations from the IT industry, as a country, we are behaving a bit like a family where there is only one star performer, who despite obstacles, makes a good life and living. And now everyone in his family wants him, using emotional blackmail or other similar tool 'beta, tujhe yaad hai...',  to bankroll their unproductive lives although they have never made any effort of their own, always blaming circumstances and others for their lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The industry employs just 1Million people and contributes to less than 5% of nominal and less than 1% of PPP adjusted GDP. To expect it to work wonders of social re-engineering or deliver some miracles of process or product innovation is similar to expecting Angelina Jolie to solve the unwanted orphans problem in the world, just because of a high profile. </p>
<p>What the industry can do, like Jolie, is raise awareness of some important issues on the socio-political agenda, may be even help raise funding but on its own, it can only employ people who are really capable (just like Jolie adopts only the kids she &#8216;falls in love with&#8217;), and it can only grow at a rate of growth which can be sustained (just like Jolie can only outsource so many kids to Pitt while she is saving the world). </p>
<p>When it comes to expectations from the IT industry, as a country, we are behaving a bit like a family where there is only one star performer, who despite obstacles, makes a good life and living. And now everyone in his family wants him, using emotional blackmail or other similar tool &#8216;beta, tujhe yaad hai&#8230;&#8217;,  to bankroll their unproductive lives although they have never made any effort of their own, always blaming circumstances and others for their lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raja</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-154379</link>
		<dc:creator>Raja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-154379</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with Rakesh, However I believe that both software companies and employees are collectively responsible. It is in best interest of employees as well as companies that some kind of unions come into picture. I personally have seen many instances were employees working overseas on contract thru major software companies are paid bare minimum wages (even less than 8$/hr which is less than minimum mandated pay by many states in US). Most of these guys live in shared accomodations like pigeon holes. The onsite/offshore model is very much dependant on guys onsite who work more than 18 hrs a day managing customer interaction during day and their offshore counterparts during night (to get the work done).  Companies shuttle people back and forth in order to avoid risk that onsite guys will get too comfortable and switch on to better companies locally. If someone goes that path, they end up being bullied by HR for money in USD to let them go gracefully (because they get contracts signed when people leave india which prevent people from switching companies with huge penalties to break them). If somebody is suffering its the grassroot software engineers who make the most of the bottomline profits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with Rakesh, However I believe that both software companies and employees are collectively responsible. It is in best interest of employees as well as companies that some kind of unions come into picture. I personally have seen many instances were employees working overseas on contract thru major software companies are paid bare minimum wages (even less than 8$/hr which is less than minimum mandated pay by many states in US). Most of these guys live in shared accomodations like pigeon holes. The onsite/offshore model is very much dependant on guys onsite who work more than 18 hrs a day managing customer interaction during day and their offshore counterparts during night (to get the work done).  Companies shuttle people back and forth in order to avoid risk that onsite guys will get too comfortable and switch on to better companies locally. If someone goes that path, they end up being bullied by HR for money in USD to let them go gracefully (because they get contracts signed when people leave india which prevent people from switching companies with huge penalties to break them). If somebody is suffering its the grassroot software engineers who make the most of the bottomline profits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rakesh</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-148784</link>
		<dc:creator>Rakesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-148784</guid>
		<description>The IT industry definitely has made a lot of progress. There are laws to protect this industry. But are there are any laws to protect the interests of its employees? Software engineers (or programmers), the bottom of the pyramid, are mostly forced to work offshore-time as well as onsite-time. I agree that software engineers are paid pretty well. But in return, they spend 10-15 hrs everyday in office, sometimes even on weekends. These companies are able to execute large and complex project only because their employees are made to work long hours and weekends. Therefore employees make a huge compromise on their health and family-life for a good salary. And there are few project managers who stand up against this. In the long run I believe that three-fourths of a software engineer's savings will be spent in his own healthcare once he retires!!!! 

I don't know whether there are any laws to protect the software engineer's interests, but I know that even if there are any, they are not being adhered to and the company and top management can force employees to do anything be it working in locations far from home, to working late hours and weekends without being paid overtime. My previous employer, one of the top 3 Indian IT companies, used to bill the customer for overtime (in foreign currency, of course) but would not pay the employee any overtime. Yes, I agree they make arrangements to drop you home and probably provide you food. But I do not think any employee would want to do overtime for food and transport. When software engineers are sent onsite, they do not get paid the actual salary mentioned in the work-permit. This is the case in most software companies. 

I believe its high time that the govt or NASSCOM steps in to protect the employees. There should be unions (defintely not affiliated to any political party) that should be allowed to function. In most developed countries, there exist unions and forums to protect employee interests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IT industry definitely has made a lot of progress. There are laws to protect this industry. But are there are any laws to protect the interests of its employees? Software engineers (or programmers), the bottom of the pyramid, are mostly forced to work offshore-time as well as onsite-time. I agree that software engineers are paid pretty well. But in return, they spend 10-15 hrs everyday in office, sometimes even on weekends. These companies are able to execute large and complex project only because their employees are made to work long hours and weekends. Therefore employees make a huge compromise on their health and family-life for a good salary. And there are few project managers who stand up against this. In the long run I believe that three-fourths of a software engineer&#8217;s savings will be spent in his own healthcare once he retires!!!! </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know whether there are any laws to protect the software engineer&#8217;s interests, but I know that even if there are any, they are not being adhered to and the company and top management can force employees to do anything be it working in locations far from home, to working late hours and weekends without being paid overtime. My previous employer, one of the top 3 Indian IT companies, used to bill the customer for overtime (in foreign currency, of course) but would not pay the employee any overtime. Yes, I agree they make arrangements to drop you home and probably provide you food. But I do not think any employee would want to do overtime for food and transport. When software engineers are sent onsite, they do not get paid the actual salary mentioned in the work-permit. This is the case in most software companies. </p>
<p>I believe its high time that the govt or NASSCOM steps in to protect the employees. There should be unions (defintely not affiliated to any political party) that should be allowed to function. In most developed countries, there exist unions and forums to protect employee interests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vikram</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-148662</link>
		<dc:creator>Vikram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-148662</guid>
		<description>Impact of Gulf boom on India is true but not fair.  It is true that Gulf laws were not fair to employees.  It is true that folks went for jobs that required far lesser skill than they have.  It is true that there was exploitation.  At the lower end.  Is it true that giant corporations did not evolve as a result?  Not true.  Sobha is a fine example of how a samll gulf business grew to be a $ 1 billion giant in the real estate development space.  Today most buildings of Infosys are built by Sobha.  They evolved in the Gulf and still have big operations there.  So did Shapoorji Pallonji (the owners of TCS).  So did Khimji enterprises.  So did Allieds.  So did Jumbo Electronics.  Mohammed Ali of Kerala went on to build Galfar, a big ticket infrastructure business in Asia.  Am an IT entrepreneur today and was a Gulf expatriate in the past.  Am proud of both the avatars.  And think both had a great role in India's evolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impact of Gulf boom on India is true but not fair.  It is true that Gulf laws were not fair to employees.  It is true that folks went for jobs that required far lesser skill than they have.  It is true that there was exploitation.  At the lower end.  Is it true that giant corporations did not evolve as a result?  Not true.  Sobha is a fine example of how a samll gulf business grew to be a $ 1 billion giant in the real estate development space.  Today most buildings of Infosys are built by Sobha.  They evolved in the Gulf and still have big operations there.  So did Shapoorji Pallonji (the owners of TCS).  So did Khimji enterprises.  So did Allieds.  So did Jumbo Electronics.  Mohammed Ali of Kerala went on to build Galfar, a big ticket infrastructure business in Asia.  Am an IT entrepreneur today and was a Gulf expatriate in the past.  Am proud of both the avatars.  And think both had a great role in India&#8217;s evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Full2njoy</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-148026</link>
		<dc:creator>Full2njoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-148026</guid>
		<description>Oh Brijesh, that's typical commie talk. Or should i say a classic case of sour grapes? What the author was talking was about how in spite of bureaucratic red tapes, the Indian IT industry has manged to flourish. Whether you like it or not, its the truth.

As an Indian who has lived outside India for more than 6 years, i can vouch for that fact. Even in Singapore, a cabbie would want to know how come India is such a software powerhouse and how come there are so many IT guys that India churns out every year. The truth is India is talked about in the world today simply because of its software power. Else, India would have been nothing else than a supplier of cheap labour.

Of course, to really scale up, the Indian IT industry should concentrate more on products than services that they are doing now. But honestly, we started off as a body shopping country and today the Indian companies are picking up orders worth at least 300-400 million dollars. Have you heard of products called icube, finacle etc. These are products made by Indian companies that are used exclusively by thousands of companies worldwide.

Give them some time, they will be there. Meanwhile, speaking of biotechnology, have you heard of the Genome valley in Hyderabad and its outskirts? Its spread over 600sq kms. Some of the best companies in the world have setup offices out there and do R&#38;D. Those include Indian pharma companies too. Have you heard of Moser Baer? Bharat Forge?

Yes, India has missed the hardware bus, but its nothing to do with the industry. The fault lies at the doorstep of the Indian govt which has stifled the industry with its stupid laws. Please raise your concerns there.

The Indian IT industry is well alive and thriving. Rather than lionising Amitabh Bachan (not taking away anything from his stupendous acting talent), i will rather have Narayan Murthy, Azim Premji as my demi gods.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Brijesh, that&#8217;s typical commie talk. Or should i say a classic case of sour grapes? What the author was talking was about how in spite of bureaucratic red tapes, the Indian IT industry has manged to flourish. Whether you like it or not, its the truth.</p>
<p>As an Indian who has lived outside India for more than 6 years, i can vouch for that fact. Even in Singapore, a cabbie would want to know how come India is such a software powerhouse and how come there are so many IT guys that India churns out every year. The truth is India is talked about in the world today simply because of its software power. Else, India would have been nothing else than a supplier of cheap labour.</p>
<p>Of course, to really scale up, the Indian IT industry should concentrate more on products than services that they are doing now. But honestly, we started off as a body shopping country and today the Indian companies are picking up orders worth at least 300-400 million dollars. Have you heard of products called icube, finacle etc. These are products made by Indian companies that are used exclusively by thousands of companies worldwide.</p>
<p>Give them some time, they will be there. Meanwhile, speaking of biotechnology, have you heard of the Genome valley in Hyderabad and its outskirts? Its spread over 600sq kms. Some of the best companies in the world have setup offices out there and do R&amp;D. Those include Indian pharma companies too. Have you heard of Moser Baer? Bharat Forge?</p>
<p>Yes, India has missed the hardware bus, but its nothing to do with the industry. The fault lies at the doorstep of the Indian govt which has stifled the industry with its stupid laws. Please raise your concerns there.</p>
<p>The Indian IT industry is well alive and thriving. Rather than lionising Amitabh Bachan (not taking away anything from his stupendous acting talent), i will rather have Narayan Murthy, Azim Premji as my demi gods.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neelakantan.b</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-148002</link>
		<dc:creator>neelakantan.b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-148002</guid>
		<description>Any industry has to start somewhere.  Japan was known for cheap toys. Now it is China. In IT we have started here, and I am sure we will move up.

The direction of Indian IT is via private minds, moving up will surely happen, but in the meantime, we need to accept this business model as a business model. This business model is an innovation - and these are the fruits of that risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any industry has to start somewhere.  Japan was known for cheap toys. Now it is China. In IT we have started here, and I am sure we will move up.</p>
<p>The direction of Indian IT is via private minds, moving up will surely happen, but in the meantime, we need to accept this business model as a business model. This business model is an innovation - and these are the fruits of that risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brijesh Joshi</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-147915</link>
		<dc:creator>Brijesh Joshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-147915</guid>
		<description>No issues with the IT industries progress,but I think for the all round development of the country we need to look ahead.

Even in IT we are not the best.What our companies like Infosys,TCS,Wipro is doing is software services outsourcing which is a small part of the IT industry which is worth about 2trillion dollars if we include even hardware.

The day we stop praising Narayan Murthy ,Infosys,Wipro,Azim Premji we will realise that China is exporting 10 times more semiconductor hardware than our total IT exports.

It will be a sorry thing for the country if we keep on praising this low cost,less innovative industry till 2020 and then realise that even Pakistan and Bangladesh have moved ahead of US in the field of Hardware,biotechnology and nano technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No issues with the IT industries progress,but I think for the all round development of the country we need to look ahead.</p>
<p>Even in IT we are not the best.What our companies like Infosys,TCS,Wipro is doing is software services outsourcing which is a small part of the IT industry which is worth about 2trillion dollars if we include even hardware.</p>
<p>The day we stop praising Narayan Murthy ,Infosys,Wipro,Azim Premji we will realise that China is exporting 10 times more semiconductor hardware than our total IT exports.</p>
<p>It will be a sorry thing for the country if we keep on praising this low cost,less innovative industry till 2020 and then realise that even Pakistan and Bangladesh have moved ahead of US in the field of Hardware,biotechnology and nano technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harish Babu</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-147728</link>
		<dc:creator>Harish Babu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/04/21/indian-it-industry/#comment-147728</guid>
		<description>Sure, major percentage of Indian economy is highly dependent on the IT Industry. But the industry still lacks innovation. We are known to do a better job when it comes to IT maintainence and innovation hardly figures in our investment. Innovation may be a risk, but risk has its returns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, major percentage of Indian economy is highly dependent on the IT Industry. But the industry still lacks innovation. We are known to do a better job when it comes to IT maintainence and innovation hardly figures in our investment. Innovation may be a risk, but risk has its returns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
