<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big With Japan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://indianeconomy.org/2007/07/31/big-with-japan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/07/31/big-with-japan/</link>
	<description>Issues &#38; insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:45:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Acorn &#187; Who&#8217;s Japan&#8217;s client?</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/07/31/big-with-japan/comment-page-1/#comment-206294</link>
		<dc:creator>The Acorn &#187; Who&#8217;s Japan&#8217;s client?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/2007/07/31/big-with-japan/#comment-206294</guid>
		<description>[...] Altman&#8217;s argument makes a nice sensational headline. But it&#8217;s also absurd. That&#8217;s because for much of the last decade, Japan &#8216;underwrote China&#8217;s growth&#8217; for a share of the spoils and is nowhere near to acquiring Chinese clients. In fact, although Japanese firms are beginning to show more interest in India, Japan&#8217;s trade with China still ten-times larger than that with India. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Altman&#8217;s argument makes a nice sensational headline. But it&#8217;s also absurd. That&#8217;s because for much of the last decade, Japan &#8216;underwrote China&#8217;s growth&#8217; for a share of the spoils and is nowhere near to acquiring Chinese clients. In fact, although Japanese firms are beginning to show more interest in India, Japan&#8217;s trade with China still ten-times larger than that with India. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suraj</title>
		<link>http://indianeconomy.org/2007/07/31/big-with-japan/comment-page-1/#comment-200111</link>
		<dc:creator>Suraj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/2007/07/31/big-with-japan/#comment-200111</guid>
		<description>Things to watch:  Misleading Statistics.  -

30% drop in Japanese investment in China.What&#039;s the cumulative investment in the past decade? 
Question: What else is left for Japanese to move to China? (other than things that will result in risking their Brand image of quality) 

Yes - the % of Japanese identifying India as a place to invest is increasing.
 =&gt; The forecast is only for next three years. Probably the status quo won&#039;t change if a long term view is polled.  (with pathetic infrastructure &amp; enervating processes ...why would they choose India over China??)
=&gt; Will the % view, materialize into more $$ ? my thought - probably not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things to watch:  Misleading Statistics.  -</p>
<p>30% drop in Japanese investment in China.What&#8217;s the cumulative investment in the past decade?<br />
Question: What else is left for Japanese to move to China? (other than things that will result in risking their Brand image of quality) </p>
<p>Yes &#8211; the % of Japanese identifying India as a place to invest is increasing.<br />
 =&gt; The forecast is only for next three years. Probably the status quo won&#8217;t change if a long term view is polled.  (with pathetic infrastructure &amp; enervating processes &#8230;why would they choose India over China??)<br />
=&gt; Will the % view, materialize into more $$ ? my thought &#8211; probably not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
